Introducing Zorro Security / A new perspective on AI security ↗
zorroSECURITYSign in Build with us ↗
A masked guardian holding a violet sword in a natural forward grip

SECURITY FOR THE AI WORKFORCE

AI moves fast.
Stay one
move ahead.

Agents now work beside your people, with their permissions, against your code, data and secrets. Zorro decides each action before it runs and signs the answer, so you can prove what happened.

01 / INTELLIGENCE IN YOUR CORNERSee the connection. Take control.

ONE WORKFORCE GRAPH
WHAT IT HOLDS TODAY

People↗Agents↗Sessions↗Data
↗

Risk doesn't live in silos.
Neither should security.

An agent inherits a permission. A tool reaches a file. A routine action crosses a boundary. The connection is where the story starts.

THE CONTEXT CHAINInteractive architecture · no customer data

Ownership · Authentication · Delegation

Who is behind the action?

Start with the person or service identity, its owner and the permissions it actually holds.

Explore this layer ↗

05 / THE ASSISTANT

Ask in plain language.
Read the evidence behind the answer.

The investigator answers over the sources you are allowed to read, dates what it found and shows the path through the graph that produced it. A model may propose a remediation. A person approves it. Closure is re-observed, not assumed.

Meet the assistant ↗

NOT A SCANNER

Detection admits a miss rate.
Authority doesn't.

A scanner asks whether content is malicious and reports how often it is wrong. Zorro asks a different question: what authority does this action require, and does the session still hold it? Untrusted content can only narrow that authority. An injected instruction can make an agent ask more. It can never make it allow more.

How we're different ↗
01

Monotone by construction.

Authority drops the moment untrusted content arrives, not when a model reads it. Encoding doesn't matter.

02

A membership test, not a score.

Allowed hosts, packages and commands come from the repository's own committed history. No threshold to tune.

03

Signed, so you can prove it.

Every allow and every denial emits evidence. A session can be sealed into a signed record of what ran, what it touched, and where it went.

Numbers that hold up
to a diligence call.

Three results, measured against real binaries. The fourth cell is the number we refuse to invent.

Read the full ledger ↗

DECISION LATENCY

111–640 µs

p50 on recorded sessions (caveat-bench), p99 in milliseconds, machine-load dependent.

COMMENT AND CONTROL REPLAY

7 of 7

exfiltration steps refused, 5 of 5 legitimate review steps allowed.

CREDENTIAL BROKER

0 of 9

leak vectors that succeeded under the broker, vs 6 of 8 without it (measured on macOS).

BENCHMARK RATE

Unmeasured

No detection or prevention rate is claimed before it's measured on ADR-Bench and AgentDojo. The harness exists; the number doesn't yet.

Every use case starts
with a real incident.

Each scenario below is tied to a documented breach. The capability answers the pattern behind it.

All use cases ↗

Think beyond
the perimeter.

Explore the journal ↗

BUILT FOR WHAT COMES NEXT

The next move
is yours.

Help shape security for a workforce
that's already changing.

Build with Zorro ↗